ClubTread Community
Register | Active Topics | Top 10 | Search | Guidelines | Report Spam
Username:
Password:
  Login   Donate
Support ClubTread
  Trail Wiki
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Group Discussion
 Conservation Corner
 Kokish IPP approved
Bookmark and Share     Reply to Topic
Author Topic  

HT
Junior Member


100 Mile House, BC
Canada

178 Posts

 Posted - 04/28/2012 :  9:15 PM  Show Profile  Reply to this posting
Kokish River private power project (northern Vanc Island) apparently approved by DFO, despite effects on salmon habitat.

http://www2.canada.com/victoriatimescolonist/news/capital_van_isl/story.html?id=02fdf463-f6fa-49d3-8a7a-1a76d64f3367

So they can sell overpriced power to BC Hydro that BC Hydro doesn't need, and will sell at a loss.

HT
Junior Member


100 Mile House, BC
Canada

178 Posts

 Posted - 05/01/2012 :  10:22 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Not good news, given the possible gutting of the Federal Fisheries Act:

http://www.clubtread.com/sforum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=42722


And the fish kills found in the Mamquam and Ashlu run-of-river projects:

http://www.clubtread.com/sforum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=42715

HT
Junior Member


100 Mile House, BC
Canada

178 Posts

 Posted - 05/01/2012 :  11:46 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Federal Omnibus Bill C-38 introduced last week:

http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2012/04/30/andrew-coyne-bill-c-38-shows-us-how-far-parliament-has-fallen/

Quotes:
"The bill runs to more than 420 pages. It amends some 60 different acts, repeals half a dozen, and adds three more, including a completely rewritten Canadian Environmental Assessment Act."

"The environmental chapters are the most extraordinary. Along with the new Act, they give cabinet broader power to override decisions of the National Energy Board, shorten the list of protected species, and abolish the Kyoto Protocol Implementation Act — among “other measures.” For much of this the first public notice was its inclusion in the bill."

Especially concerning since the BC Govt signed an agreement giving up requirements to carry out BC environmental assessments on certain projects:

http://www.eao.gov.bc.ca/EAO_NEB_Projects.html




Any comments?

Edited by - HT on 05/01/2012 12:51 PM
ClubTread Supporter

burnabyhiker
Advanced Member

Fast hikin, carrot chompin, always grinnin, gear scatterin recipient of the Theta Lake manouver

Burnaby
2047 Posts

 Posted - 05/07/2012 :  9:24 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
It does seem a bit troubling.

cambium
Advanced Member



3022 Posts

 Posted - 05/07/2012 :  11:11 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by HT

Federal Omnibus Bill C-38 introduced last week:

http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2012/04/30/andrew-coyne-bill-c-38-shows-us-how-far-parliament-has-fallen/

Quotes:
"The bill runs to more than 420 pages. It amends some 60 different acts, repeals half a dozen, and adds three more, including a completely rewritten Canadian Environmental Assessment Act."

"The environmental chapters are the most extraordinary. Along with the new Act, they give cabinet broader power to override decisions of the National Energy Board, shorten the list of protected species, and abolish the Kyoto Protocol Implementation Act — among “other measures.” For much of this the first public notice was its inclusion in the bill."

Especially concerning since the BC Govt signed an agreement giving up requirements to carry out BC environmental assessments on certain projects:

http://www.eao.gov.bc.ca/EAO_NEB_Projects.html




Any comments?



yes, Christy Clark's Staffer that is fresh from Harper's inner circledrawing room is receiving a 20 percent pay raise. The rest of us...nada!

HT
Junior Member


100 Mile House, BC
Canada

178 Posts

 Posted - 05/08/2012 :  08:01 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by burnabyhiker

It does seem a bit troubling.



A BIT troubling??

I guess potential diluted bitumen spills into BC rivers and coastline is a BIT troubling.

And diverting a large part of a healthy salmon river to produce power that BC Hydro will buy and then sell at a loss is a BIT troubling.

Govt ramming through huge legislation changes in an omnibus bill with limited debate is a BIT troubling.

Creeping FASCISM is a BIT troubling.

In Canada we have this funny old tradition called Democracy.


Edited by - HT on 05/08/2012 09:07 AM

cambium
Advanced Member



3022 Posts

 Posted - 05/08/2012 :  09:54 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by HT

quote:
Originally posted by burnabyhiker

It does seem a bit troubling.



A BIT troubling??

I guess potential diluted bitumen spills into BC rivers and coastline is a BIT troubling.

And diverting a large part of a healthy salmon river to produce power that BC Hydro will buy and then sell at a loss is a BIT troubling.

Govt ramming through huge legislation changes in an omnibus bill with limited debate is a BIT troubling.

Creeping FASCISM is a BIT troubling.

In Canada we have this funny old tradition called Democracy.





In Canada we have this funny old tradition called Apathy.
ClubTread Supporter

burnabyhiker
Advanced Member

Fast hikin, carrot chompin, always grinnin, gear scatterin recipient of the Theta Lake manouver

Burnaby
2047 Posts

 Posted - 05/08/2012 :  6:49 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Trying to get straight answers is difficult. Last year I spent time online researching IPP & ROR projects. It seemed impossible to find facts. Certain questions get totally opposite answers.

My initial thoughts were that small footstep, green power was a great idea.
I was concerned that many ex-liberals (re: connected) seemed to find their way on to the boards. And that BC Hydro was forced to buy power and above-market rates.

I'm not sure my time spent did anything but end in frustration for me.

erratics
Junior Member


Port Moody, BC
169 Posts

 Posted - 05/12/2012 :  10:00 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I think these days we in BC have a provincial and federal government that don't give a flying "you know what" about the salmon and other environmental values we have in BC. I'm concerned with the damage that's occurred like the approval of all these IPP's which it seems continues to carry on until we have the opportunity to change things politically.
  Topic  
 All Forums > Group Discussion > Conservation Corner Bookmark and Share     Reply to Topic

Register | Active Topics | Top 10 | Search | Guidelines | Report Spam